|
There was a great deal to be troubled
by in a report by the International Committee of the Red Cross
documenting the kinds of torture and abuse inflicted on terrorism
suspects by the Central Intelligence Agency. One disturbing footnote is
that medical personnel were deeply involved in facilitating the abuses,
which were intended to coerce suspects into providing intelligence.
The report, prepared in 2007 but kept secret until it was published
by The New York Review of Books, was based on Red Cross interviews in
late 2006 with 14 “high-value detainees,” who include some of the most
dangerous terrorists in custody. The prisoners’ complaints gain
credibility because they described similar abuses and had been kept in
isolation at different locations, with no chance to concoct a common
story.
Various prisoners said they had been subjected to waterboarding,
forced to stand for days with their arms shackled overhead, confined in
small boxes, beaten and kicked, slammed repeatedly into walls,
prevented from sleeping, deprived of solid food, forced to remain naked
for weeks or months at a stretch, often in frigid cells and immersed in
cold water. All were kept in continuous solitary confinement for their
C.I.A. detention, ranging from 16 months to more than four years.
Medical personnel seem to have been involved mostly as facilitators
rather than torturers or interrogators. In one case, they monitored a
detainee’s oxygen saturation with a device attached to his finger so
waterboarding could be stopped before the prisoner suffocated. In
another case, an amputee forced to stand with his arms shackled
overhead had his intact leg checked daily for signs of dangerous
swelling. Several detainees said health workers sometimes instructed
interrogators to continue, adjust or stop particular methods of abuse.
Such activities violate the ethical codes of major health
organizations, both national and international. The Red Cross called it
“a gross breach of medical ethics” that in some cases “amounted to
participation in torture and/or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.”
None of the health personnel wore identification, but the prisoners
inferred that they were physicians or psychologists. They also could
have been paramedics, physician’s assistants or other less-trained
personnel.
The report underscores the need to have a full-scale investigation
into these abusive practices and into who precisely participated in
them. Only then will we know whether indictments or, in the case of
physicians, the loss of medical licenses, are warranted.
|
|